Premier League clubs are staring down the barrel of monster compensation claims after radical employment law changes scrap the cap on unfair dismissal payouts and it’s not just players who’ll be queueing up with their hands out.
The Employment Rights Act 2025, officially rubber stamped by Parliament in December, rips up the existing rulebook that’s protected clubs for decades . Gone is the £118,000 cap on compensation. Gone is the two year qualifying period. From 2027, employees including footballers, backroom staff, and even kitmen, can bring claims after just SIX MONTHS, with no ceiling on what they can pocket .
Top City lawyers are already sharpening their pencils. Stefan Martin at Hogan Lovells warns compensation could now be “in theory… unlimited” . For a sport where even squad players pocket five figures weekly, that’s a financial grenade with the pin pulled.
The immediate panic? Those dreaded “bomb squads” players frozen out, forced to train with the kids or shipped out on loan against their will. Barrister Yasin Patel from Church Court Chambers reckons footie’s finally lost its immunity.
“A footballer’s playing time is limited, in some cases less than 15 years, this law change therefore could be very significant,” he told us. “Especially when you consider players who are loaned out by parent clubs as they no longer want them there and want to effectively force them to leave, or players who are made to train with ‘bomb squads’.”
Translation? That clause in every contract where clubs think they can sideline unhappy players and wait for ’em to sling their hook? Might not be worth the paper it’s written on.
The timing’s a nightmare. Premier League clubs are already wrestling with Squad Cost Rules coming down the track, designed to cap spending at 85% of revenue . Now they’ve got uncapped compensation claims to factor into those spreadsheets.
It’s not just about players, neither. Former Arsenal kitman Mark Bonnick sacked on Christmas Eve 2024 after 22 years at the club, is already testing the waters with an unfair dismissal claim over his social media posts criticising Israel . His case, heading to mediation in June, is exactly the sort of headache sporting directors never used to lose sleep over.
The Professional Footballers’ Association are watching developments like hawks. With player contracts typically fixed term, the non renewal of a deal now counts as “dismissal” for tribunal purposes . Clubs letting squad players run down their contracts? Could be a very expensive decision.
Adrian Hoggarth, employment partner at Jurit, warns the smart money’s on senior execs and first team regulars testing the boundaries first.
“Much of the early commentary has focused on headline grabbing examples such as professional footballers, but the more consequential impact is likely to be felt in the boardroom,” he said . “Senior executives and C.suite leaders, whose remuneration packages often include complex incentives and long term awards, could pursue substantially higher claims.”
The Premier League’s response? Crickets so far. But behind closed doors, legal departments are burning midnight oil rewriting contracts and reassessing risk.
For clubs used to wielding the axe whenever form dips or budgets tighten, these are uncharted waters. Financial planning around player exits just got exponentially more complicated and potentially ruinously expensive.
As one source put it: “The days of football being immune to large payouts are coming to an end.”
Buckle up. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
